2804:7ef4::/32
At a glance
Subnets
/32 block
Visibility
48 of 62 vantage points
RPKI
Registry
BRAllocated 3rd March 2021
AS paths to this prefix
All pathsOne observed path, hop by hop, from the origin out to Sao Paulo.
Seen from Sao Paulo
- Peer of AS269485seen on 14 paths from 14 vantage points
- Peer of AS271657seen on 99 paths from 43 vantage points
- Peer of AS268248seen on 328 paths from 110 vantage points
- Peer of AS7738seen on 875 paths from 2 vantage points
USOne path, hop by hop, from the origin outward to the vantage point that saw it. Counts beside each step are how often we see that pair adjacent anywhere in the table, not how often this path was used — BGP carries no traffic figures.
Every path we see
- Amsterdam271657263434423034549213151This path
- London, UK2716572634344230900251907This path
- Sao Paulo269485271657268248773832590Shown above
- Singapore27165726343442306939132337This path
Each row is one path genuinely present in the routing table at our last snapshot, read outward from the origin to the vantage point that saw it. Open a row to follow that one path hop by hop. A heavier line in the graph means more vantage points reach the prefix that same way.
Route visibility
77%
Seen by 48 of 62 full-feed vantage points
Partially propagatedObserved at 4 of our collectors.
What this percentage counts
The denominator counts only full-feed peers — peers carrying a substantially complete routing table at the moment of the snapshot. IXP route-server peers usually feed partial tables and are excluded, because including them would make a normally propagated prefix look as though half the internet could not see it.
It measures how widely an announcement has spread across the networks we can observe. It says nothing about whether the prefix is reachable from any particular place, or how it performs.
Registry and RPKI
- RIR
- LACNIC — Latin America and the Caribbean
- Country
- Brazil
- Allocated
- 3rd March 2021
- Allocation block
- 2804:7ef4::/32
- Status
- allocated
- Origin validation
- No ROA
No ROA covers this prefix, so RPKI has nothing to say about it either way. This is still the common case for a large share of the routing table.
Prefix hierarchy
Announcements above, below and beside this one in the real routing table.
Left to right is specificity: a shorter mask covering more address space, then this prefix, then the announcements carved out inside it. Only the first few of each are drawn — the tables below list them all.
Covering announcements
No less specific announcement covers this prefix.
More specific announcements
| Prefix | Addresses | Origin | Visibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2804:7ef4::/33 | 2.1B × /64 | AS271657Iran Telecom | 62/62 |
| 2804:7ef4:8000::/33 | 2.1B × /64 | AS271657Iran Telecom | 62/62 |
Sibling prefixes
No prefix of the same length in the same parent block is announced.
History
Why these dates start where they do
A first-seen date is the first time we saw that origin, not the first time it appeared in BGP. Our history is forward-only with no backfill, so it says nothing about the period before we started collecting — treat the earliest dates with suspicion.
Routing data derived from RouteViews MRT archives and public registry data.