subnet.im

2402:4e00:4070::/44

At a glance

Subnets

1,048,576 × /64

/44 block

Visibility

97%

62 of 64 vantage points

RPKI

Valid

Registry

APNICCN

Allocated 13th May 2010

AS paths to this prefix

All paths

One observed path, hop by hop, from the origin out to Amsterdam.

OriginVantage point · Amsterdam
One AS path to 2402:4e00:4070::/44 as seen from Amsterdam, read outward from the origin: AS45090 → AS134756 → AS4134 → AS25091 → AS8298. Each hop is listed with its network name beneath the graph.AS45090Tencent CloudOriginAS134756CHINANET Nanjing …AS4134China Telecom Bac…AS25091IP-Max SAAS8298IPng Networks GmbH

Seen from Amsterdam

  1. Peer of AS45090seen on 3,538 paths from 140 vantage points
  2. Peer of AS134756seen on 22,841 paths from 140 vantage points
  3. Peer of AS4134seen on 60,401 paths from 5 vantage points
  4. Peer of AS25091seen on 663,434 paths from 2 vantage points
  5. 5AS8298IPng Networks GmbHCHVantage point

One path, hop by hop, from the origin outward to the vantage point that saw it. Counts beside each step are how often we see that pair adjacent anywhere in the table, not how often this path was used — BGP carries no traffic figures.

Every path we see

  1. London, UK45090134756413435280This path
  2. Amsterdam450901347564134250918298Shown above
  3. Sao Paulo450901347564134645335280This path
  4. Singapore4509013475641346939132337This path

Each row is one path genuinely present in the routing table at our last snapshot, read outward from the origin to the vantage point that saw it. Open a row to follow that one path hop by hop. A heavier line in the graph means more vantage points reach the prefix that same way.

Route visibility

97%

Seen by 62 of 64 full-feed vantage points

Globally propagated

Observed at 4 of our collectors.

What this percentage counts

The denominator counts only full-feed peers — peers carrying a substantially complete routing table at the moment of the snapshot. IXP route-server peers usually feed partial tables and are excluded, because including them would make a normally propagated prefix look as though half the internet could not see it.

It measures how widely an announcement has spread across the networks we can observe. It says nothing about whether the prefix is reachable from any particular place, or how it performs.

Registry and RPKI

RIR
APNIC — Asia-Pacific
Country
China
Allocated
13th May 2010
Allocation block
2402:4e00::/32
Status
allocated
Origin validation
Valid

A ROA exists that authorises this origin AS to announce this prefix at this length.

ROAs covering this prefix

Route Origin Authorisations covering 2402:4e00:4070::/44
ROA prefixAuthorised originMax length
2402:4e00:4070::/44AS45090/44
2402:4e00::/33AS45090/33
2402:4e00::/32AS38283/32
2402:4e00::/32AS45090/32

Prefix hierarchy

Announcements above, below and beside this one in the real routing table.

CoveringMore specific
Prefix hierarchy for 2402:4e00:4070::/44: the announcements covering it on the left, the announcements inside it on the right. Every prefix drawn is also listed in the tables below.2402:4e00::/33AS450902402:4e00::/32AS450902402:4e00:4070::…AS45090This prefix2402:4e00:4060::…AS45090

Left to right is specificity: a shorter mask covering more address space, then this prefix, then the announcements carved out inside it. Only the first few of each are drawn — the tables below list them all.

Covering announcements

Announcements that contain 2402:4e00:4070::/44
PrefixAddressesOriginVisibility
2402:4e00::/332.1B × /64AS45090Tencent Cloud63/64
2402:4e00::/324.3B × /64AS45090Tencent Cloud63/64

More specific announcements

Nothing inside this block is announced separately.

Sibling prefixes

Prefixes of the same length sharing a parent block with 2402:4e00:4070::/44
PrefixAddressesOriginVisibility
2402:4e00:4060::/441M × /64AS45090Tencent Cloud64/64

History

  1. AS4509012th August 2026 — present
  2. AS429001005522nd September 2026 — 23rd September 2026
Why these dates start where they do

A first-seen date is the first time we saw that origin, not the first time it appeared in BGP. Our history is forward-only with no backfill, so it says nothing about the period before we started collecting — treat the earliest dates with suspicion.

Routing data derived from RouteViews MRT archives and public registry data.