2001:ce0:2::/48
At a glance
Subnets
/48 block
Visibility
61 of 62 vantage points
RPKI
Registry
HKAllocated 24th December 2002
AS paths to this prefix
All pathsOne observed path, hop by hop, from the origin out to Singapore.
Seen from Singapore
- Peer of AS4528seen on 654 paths from 137 vantage points
- Peer of AS3662seen on 815 paths from 63 vantage points
- Peer of AS6939seen on 320,794 paths from 2 vantage points
US
SGOne path, hop by hop, from the origin outward to the vantage point that saw it. Counts beside each step are how often we see that pair adjacent anywhere in the table, not how often this path was used — BGP carries no traffic figures.
Every path we see
- Amsterdam452836626939213151This path
- London, UK45283662693951907This path
- Sao Paulo45283662693932590This path
- Singapore452836626939132337Shown above
Each row is one path genuinely present in the routing table at our last snapshot, read outward from the origin to the vantage point that saw it. Open a row to follow that one path hop by hop. A heavier line in the graph means more vantage points reach the prefix that same way.
Route visibility
98%
Seen by 61 of 62 full-feed vantage points
Globally propagatedObserved at 4 of our collectors.
What this percentage counts
The denominator counts only full-feed peers — peers carrying a substantially complete routing table at the moment of the snapshot. IXP route-server peers usually feed partial tables and are excluded, because including them would make a normally propagated prefix look as though half the internet could not see it.
It measures how widely an announcement has spread across the networks we can observe. It says nothing about whether the prefix is reachable from any particular place, or how it performs.
Registry and RPKI
- RIR
- APNIC — Asia-Pacific
- Country
- Hong Kong SAR China
- Allocated
- 24th December 2002
- Allocation block
- 2001:ce0::/32
- Status
- allocated
- Origin validation
- No ROA
No ROA covers this prefix, so RPKI has nothing to say about it either way. This is still the common case for a large share of the routing table.
Prefix hierarchy
Announcements above, below and beside this one in the real routing table.
Left to right is specificity: a shorter mask covering more address space, then this prefix, then the announcements carved out inside it. Only the first few of each are drawn — the tables below list them all.
Covering announcements
| Prefix | Addresses | Origin | Visibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001:ce0::/32 | 4.3B × /64 | AS3662Joint Universities Computer Centre Limited | 61/62 |
More specific announcements
Nothing inside this block is announced separately.
Sibling prefixes
| Prefix | Addresses | Origin | Visibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001:ce0:3::/48 | 65.5k × /64 | AS3661The Chinese University of Hong Kong | 61/62 |
History
- AS452812th August 2026 — present
Why these dates start where they do
A first-seen date is the first time we saw that origin, not the first time it appeared in BGP. Our history is forward-only with no backfill, so it says nothing about the period before we started collecting — treat the earliest dates with suspicion.
Routing data derived from RouteViews MRT archives and public registry data.